Once upon a time, there was a country where the people had no problems. Well, that’s not exactly true -- they had problems -- but none they couldn’t solve by themselves … until the Prostiticians got involved.
The Prostiticians studied the situation very carefully. "If they don’t have problems, we’ve got a problem!" said one. "If this keeps up, we'll be out of business," whined another. "If this keeps up, we’ll have to get honest jobs," whimpered a third. "Let’s go ask the Lawiars for advice." So that is what they did.
The Lawiars reflected on how their business had dwindled, with people solving their own problems, and they put on their thinking caps. "Think, Lawiars!" implored the Prostiticians. "Tax your brains!"
"That’s it!" cried the Lawiars. "Tax their brains."
"Okay, but we'll need a good excu… uh, reason," said the Prostiticians. "Do you have one?"
"No" said the Lawiars, "maybe the Banksters have one. Let's ask them."
"Simple as compound interest," said the Banksters. "Borrow lots of money from us, buy the votes of the people with it, tax them to repay it -- with interest, of course, since we don't work for free, ya know. Before you know it, the people will be over their heads in debt, blaming each other, begging you to solve their problems. You can start wars to distract them, buy their votes with "bailouts", the Lawiars will be up to their eyeballs in lucrative lawsuits, the Justitutes can reverse the Constitution, and we'll be rolling in profits."
"Such a deal!" exclaimed the Lawiars. "Genius!" proclaimed the Prostiticians. "Do you Banksters have that much money to loan?"
"We have pens, printing presses, and computers" said one Bankster. "We know how to write, print, and push buttons on a keyboard," said another. "Bottom line, we can fake it," said a third. "All we need is for you to pass a law making our 'money' the only money the Sheeple are allowed use. Ya think you Lawiars can write up a law for that?"
"Piece o'cake!" said one Lawiar. "Can o' corn!" said another. "Easy-peasy," said a third.
"Well, don't get carried away with simplicity," said the Banksters in unison. "We don't want the people figuring it out before they're over their heads in debt."
"Trust us!" said the Lawiars.
"Just like we trust the Prostiticians," said the Banksters, "sign here."
"How much can we borrow?" asked the Prostiticians.
"As much as you can squeeze out of the Sheeple, minus our interest," said the Banksters. "But you'll need to start small, so they don't smell a rat," they advised. "Get our Presstitutes to help sell the idea."
"We’ll need to raise the next generation of Sheepizens to know their places, but not too much else," said the Prostiticians. "Let's give the schools some of this borrowed money, so we can tell them what not to teach, and how to not teach it. Our Professtitutes at the Universities can tell their Stoogents how brilliant our new idea is, and the Treacher's Union can muzzle any Treacher who might teach kids stuff they shouldn't know, and drug any kids who show signs of figuring it out."
"What if some Sheepizen objects about, you know … the Constitution?" asked a nervous Prostitician.
"That g__d___ piece of paper?" sneered one. "Idiot!" said another. "Don't be stupid -- remember we get to pick the Justitutes from a list of Lawiars." reminded a third. "It's all under control."
So they all breathed a collective sigh of relief. The Presstitutes made up any "news" they were told to write. The Prostiticians made laws to let the Banksters create the Feudal Reserve System to lend more "money" than anyone could ever repay, and the Infernal Revenue Service to tax it back, and soon had their Sheeple firmly saddled with unending problems. The Lawiars had all the lawsuits and trials they could handle, in courts run by their brother and sister Justitutes. Professtitutes and Treachers were well paid to keep the kids from learning too much. The Banksters were rolling in obscene profits, and would soon own everything in sight. And the Sheeple never did figure out why they couldn't get out of debt.
So they all lived happily ever after, at least until the Sheeple no longer had enough brains to tax, so they couldn‘t both pay taxes … and eat. Then, the Prostiticians, Banksters, Lawiars, Justitutes, Presstitutes, Professtitutes, and Treachers all had a big barbecue.
Moral: If problems are what you want, problems are what you can get, especially when you're dealing with Sheeple.
==========
Fortunately, this is only a fairy tale! Wouldn't you hate to live in a country like that?
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
'Splain this one to me, please!
Take a look at this photo, and tell me what this arrangement of equipment is for:
It's part of this article: http://tinyurl.com/2os45c, but I don't know whether to believe it or not. Still, I'm hard pressed to come up with an alternative that makes sense.
It's part of this article: http://tinyurl.com/2os45c, but I don't know whether to believe it or not. Still, I'm hard pressed to come up with an alternative that makes sense.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
No More Mr. Nice Guy
Q: What’s the greatest political failing of American voters -- ignorance or apathy?
A : I don’t know, and I don’t care.
These are bitter words for me. Although I sometimes seem a pessimist to those who know me, I am usually upbeat about many things, e.g., work, learning, exercise, non-coercive human interaction.
I have even striven to persuade some sheepizens of this once (and future) worthy nation to somehow pull their collective head out of their collective, er, … TV set, long enough to realize that their government, money, and fate are in the hands of their worst enemies, and that they had best take them back into their own hands, lest they die broke, hungry slaves.
Alas, they would no longer know what to do with them if they did. The vast majority are sheeple. Their ignorance is as incurable as it is willful; it’s what makes them sheeple. All they want is to be entertained and directed without the need to think, fed enough to grow large without effort, sheared without having to admit it, and when time comes to feed the shepherd, swiftly terminated without embarrassment.
We’re not quite down to, "every man for himself," yet, but close. It’s more like, everyone for his/her own self, family, and friends – the few likeminded people you can trust when the razor wire goes up, which doesn’t leave most of us with a lot of options. We are now living the Weimar Republic experience, all too soon to be followed by the Fourth Reich experience, barring Celestial Intervention.
The sheepizen next door may be a nice enough guy in good times, but when he (not to mention thousands like him) loses his job in this "robust" economy, or his government check fails to cover his ever-inflated survival costs, how much do you really want him to know about your food/water/medicine/fuel/ammo stashes? (You do have them – right?)
Regardless, I have given up trying to persuade sheeple to be sovereign Citizens – it only annoys them, and will eventually bring me attention I don’t want.
A : I don’t know, and I don’t care.
These are bitter words for me. Although I sometimes seem a pessimist to those who know me, I am usually upbeat about many things, e.g., work, learning, exercise, non-coercive human interaction.
I have even striven to persuade some sheepizens of this once (and future) worthy nation to somehow pull their collective head out of their collective, er, … TV set, long enough to realize that their government, money, and fate are in the hands of their worst enemies, and that they had best take them back into their own hands, lest they die broke, hungry slaves.
Alas, they would no longer know what to do with them if they did. The vast majority are sheeple. Their ignorance is as incurable as it is willful; it’s what makes them sheeple. All they want is to be entertained and directed without the need to think, fed enough to grow large without effort, sheared without having to admit it, and when time comes to feed the shepherd, swiftly terminated without embarrassment.
We’re not quite down to, "every man for himself," yet, but close. It’s more like, everyone for his/her own self, family, and friends – the few likeminded people you can trust when the razor wire goes up, which doesn’t leave most of us with a lot of options. We are now living the Weimar Republic experience, all too soon to be followed by the Fourth Reich experience, barring Celestial Intervention.
The sheepizen next door may be a nice enough guy in good times, but when he (not to mention thousands like him) loses his job in this "robust" economy, or his government check fails to cover his ever-inflated survival costs, how much do you really want him to know about your food/water/medicine/fuel/ammo stashes? (You do have them – right?)
Regardless, I have given up trying to persuade sheeple to be sovereign Citizens – it only annoys them, and will eventually bring me attention I don’t want.
Monday, December 31, 2007
I'm being a RepugliCon (until the primaries are over)
Well, I did it -- put the mark of Cain on my own forehead, as far as anyone who sees my voter's registration knows. From today until the primary election is over, I'm just another RepugliCon, easily mistaken for one of those new-style RepugliCons proudly known (by themselves, anyway) as "neo-cons."
I had to do it. In the People's Republic of California, parties may choose whether they'll allow "crossover" voting (by voters not registered in their party) in the primaries. The DemocRat party, and the Constitution party do. All other parties don't. Their actions and mine are understood this way: This is the only way I can vote for Dr. Ron Paul to be the Republican presidential candidate. It's also the only roadblock the neo-con fascists have to (legally) throw in my way, and they hesitate to draw Blackwater into the process so early (thrift -- no doubt.)
I know they hate being called fascists, since that's a tag which still retains much of its pejorative punch, like "communist" ought to, but never really did. But if the Dems can laugh off "commie," and play Sir Parse-a-lot word games about how they're not really socialists, just "progressives," the 'Pugs can't shake "fascist" so easily. They much prefer "corporatist," since they like turning most of the dirty work of government (what they consider "government" work) to big, well-heeled, insider corporations. "Corporatism," said Mussolini (who ought to know) is the proper way to think of fascism -- the marriage of the corporation and the state.
"But the private sector is so much more efficient than government -- they have to meet a payroll and show a profit." It's true. Ask those who worked so efficiently for so many of the favored German corporations, during WWII. Oh, that's right, you can't -- they were so efficient, they're dead. You can, however, bet your bottom Reichsmark, er, dollar, that those corporations got the tip-top efficient most out of those, uh, workers, before, well ... you know.
Private business is almost always more efficient at what it does. But there are jobs governments are notoriously good at, that they still should never undertake, except when attacked (like killing people and breaking things.) Moreover, those "jobs" should never be contracted out to the private sector, regardless of how efficiently and profitably it can do them, since humankind are generally better off when those jobs are not being done, and we don't want to fall in the trap of prolonging the "job" for the sake of (someone else's) profit. And it's not really cricket for the government to supply its own initial attack, either.
Of course, when you're the aforementioned "someone else," and you're collecting the profits, not paying them, the desirability of prolonging the killing and breaking looks somehow, ... different. And when you're a stockholder in a profitable corporation, and/or a doctrinaire corporatist being feted at corporate parties, living on corporate stipends, or kept in office by corporate campaign funds, killing and breaking for a nice hefty profit (even if not always fun) can be downright seductive. Just ask the families Rothschild, Rockefeller, Roosevelt, and Bush.
When you're more committed to the survival of "allied" nations than to that of your own, pouring the treasure of your nation, and the lives of its youth, down the funnel of war, into corporations whose stock your friends and family own, can probably seem almost holy, not to mention courageous. I wouldn't know, but seeing and hearing those who advocate for it, I suspect.
Dr. Paul is light years away from the new "mainstream" (downstream) of his nominal party. I hope and pray he survives this election.
I had to do it. In the People's Republic of California, parties may choose whether they'll allow "crossover" voting (by voters not registered in their party) in the primaries. The DemocRat party, and the Constitution party do. All other parties don't. Their actions and mine are understood this way: This is the only way I can vote for Dr. Ron Paul to be the Republican presidential candidate. It's also the only roadblock the neo-con fascists have to (legally) throw in my way, and they hesitate to draw Blackwater into the process so early (thrift -- no doubt.)
I know they hate being called fascists, since that's a tag which still retains much of its pejorative punch, like "communist" ought to, but never really did. But if the Dems can laugh off "commie," and play Sir Parse-a-lot word games about how they're not really socialists, just "progressives," the 'Pugs can't shake "fascist" so easily. They much prefer "corporatist," since they like turning most of the dirty work of government (what they consider "government" work) to big, well-heeled, insider corporations. "Corporatism," said Mussolini (who ought to know) is the proper way to think of fascism -- the marriage of the corporation and the state.
"But the private sector is so much more efficient than government -- they have to meet a payroll and show a profit." It's true. Ask those who worked so efficiently for so many of the favored German corporations, during WWII. Oh, that's right, you can't -- they were so efficient, they're dead. You can, however, bet your bottom Reichsmark, er, dollar, that those corporations got the tip-top efficient most out of those, uh, workers, before, well ... you know.
Private business is almost always more efficient at what it does. But there are jobs governments are notoriously good at, that they still should never undertake, except when attacked (like killing people and breaking things.) Moreover, those "jobs" should never be contracted out to the private sector, regardless of how efficiently and profitably it can do them, since humankind are generally better off when those jobs are not being done, and we don't want to fall in the trap of prolonging the "job" for the sake of (someone else's) profit. And it's not really cricket for the government to supply its own initial attack, either.
Of course, when you're the aforementioned "someone else," and you're collecting the profits, not paying them, the desirability of prolonging the killing and breaking looks somehow, ... different. And when you're a stockholder in a profitable corporation, and/or a doctrinaire corporatist being feted at corporate parties, living on corporate stipends, or kept in office by corporate campaign funds, killing and breaking for a nice hefty profit (even if not always fun) can be downright seductive. Just ask the families Rothschild, Rockefeller, Roosevelt, and Bush.
When you're more committed to the survival of "allied" nations than to that of your own, pouring the treasure of your nation, and the lives of its youth, down the funnel of war, into corporations whose stock your friends and family own, can probably seem almost holy, not to mention courageous. I wouldn't know, but seeing and hearing those who advocate for it, I suspect.
Dr. Paul is light years away from the new "mainstream" (downstream) of his nominal party. I hope and pray he survives this election.
Sunday, December 9, 2007
"Terrorist Catch and Release Program "
A friend sent a recycled oldie (~2003) called the "Terrorist Catch and Release Program "
"U.S. Navy releases Al Qaeda Terrorist -
"I can't believe it!
"The US Navy today announced that it has released a senior Al Qaeda terrorist after questioning him extensively for 27 days while being held prisoner aboard a US aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea.
"In a humanitarian gesture, the terrorist was given $50 US and a white 1962 Ford Fairlane automobile upon being released from custody.
"The attached photo shows the terrorist on his way home just after being released by the Navy."
The message ends with a photoshopped pic of the subject automobile sailing off the bow of the main deck of a carrier in the vast and choppy sea.
======
Here's my reply to him:
Even as a 4-year old stretch, it's a good joke. But I'm far more concerned with domestic catch and release, wherein the cops end up tippy-toe-dancing like Nureyev to avoid, at all costs, accidentally uncovering some un-ignoreable evidence that the perp they have just stopped (or arrested) is a criminal foreign invader ("illegal immigrant," to use the inaccurate vernacular) which discovery, however inadvertent, runs so violently counter to the prevailing "political correctness" (cultural Marxism) of the jurisdiction for which he/she works, that his/her job might well be forfeit.
Consequently, many lesser violations of the law are so flagrantly and openly tolerated, e.g., traffic offenses, that the criminals hardly fear to commit them openly in the presence of law enforcement officers, as long as they make no secret of not being here legally. A "YO ♥ JALISCO" bumpersticker, or amped-up Cumbia blasting from the car stereo works on cops in San Francisco like garlic on vampires in Transylvania. After all "Es mà cultura," dontchaknow?
Entire districts are "allowed" to park in the middle lanes of the street, on the sidewalks, and if our "guests" ever master the art, up on the sides of buildings, for that matter. Graffitti, speeding, drunk driving, illegal voting, and gang rape are simply taken for granted as part of the price we must pay for having them here, for Heaven only knows, housing, food, transportation, medical, education, and legal service subsidies -- to the tune of $20K/family/year -- are hardly enough reward to keep the price of lettuce down where it presumably belongs.
Only murder (of other, ... honored guests, certainly not mere Americans) -- and then even only if committed with ... wait for it ... a gun(!) is heinous enough to warrant uncovering the perp's unfortunate lack of documentation, whereupon his consulate must be notified, and bail (and sometimes, flight to avoid prosecution) arranged.
Lest you think all my distaste is aimed at those native to our nearest southern neighbor, I'll recall for you that in 2005 alone, the Border Patrol (before it was rolled up into the Department of Homeland Insecurity to contain its unfortunate tendency to actually catch invaders) apprehended (and then released -- on their own recognizance[!] and promise to later appear at a hearing[!] to determine their immigration status) -- approximately 79,000 persons from "nations of interest," bureaucratese for Muslim countries, North Korea, and China. Fortunately, that problem has been ameliorated by ordering the remaining BP (now ICE) agents not to stop obviously Asian "visitors" coming across the Mexican (also the Canadian?) border.
I know that if millions of us went to their nations, and behaved as they do when here, we would be lucky to merely be arrested and jailed. So, yes, I like "the Navy's" version of catch and release better than the civilian version. I expect it to become more popular as the sellout progresses. But this one-at-a-time business will need streamlining.
"U.S. Navy releases Al Qaeda Terrorist -
"I can't believe it!
"The US Navy today announced that it has released a senior Al Qaeda terrorist after questioning him extensively for 27 days while being held prisoner aboard a US aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea.
"In a humanitarian gesture, the terrorist was given $50 US and a white 1962 Ford Fairlane automobile upon being released from custody.
"The attached photo shows the terrorist on his way home just after being released by the Navy."
The message ends with a photoshopped pic of the subject automobile sailing off the bow of the main deck of a carrier in the vast and choppy sea.
======
Here's my reply to him:
Even as a 4-year old stretch, it's a good joke. But I'm far more concerned with domestic catch and release, wherein the cops end up tippy-toe-dancing like Nureyev to avoid, at all costs, accidentally uncovering some un-ignoreable evidence that the perp they have just stopped (or arrested) is a criminal foreign invader ("illegal immigrant," to use the inaccurate vernacular) which discovery, however inadvertent, runs so violently counter to the prevailing "political correctness" (cultural Marxism) of the jurisdiction for which he/she works, that his/her job might well be forfeit.
Consequently, many lesser violations of the law are so flagrantly and openly tolerated, e.g., traffic offenses, that the criminals hardly fear to commit them openly in the presence of law enforcement officers, as long as they make no secret of not being here legally. A "YO ♥ JALISCO" bumpersticker, or amped-up Cumbia blasting from the car stereo works on cops in San Francisco like garlic on vampires in Transylvania. After all "Es mà cultura," dontchaknow?
Entire districts are "allowed" to park in the middle lanes of the street, on the sidewalks, and if our "guests" ever master the art, up on the sides of buildings, for that matter. Graffitti, speeding, drunk driving, illegal voting, and gang rape are simply taken for granted as part of the price we must pay for having them here, for Heaven only knows, housing, food, transportation, medical, education, and legal service subsidies -- to the tune of $20K/family/year -- are hardly enough reward to keep the price of lettuce down where it presumably belongs.
Only murder (of other, ... honored guests, certainly not mere Americans) -- and then even only if committed with ... wait for it ... a gun(!) is heinous enough to warrant uncovering the perp's unfortunate lack of documentation, whereupon his consulate must be notified, and bail (and sometimes, flight to avoid prosecution) arranged.
Lest you think all my distaste is aimed at those native to our nearest southern neighbor, I'll recall for you that in 2005 alone, the Border Patrol (before it was rolled up into the Department of Homeland Insecurity to contain its unfortunate tendency to actually catch invaders) apprehended (and then released -- on their own recognizance[!] and promise to later appear at a hearing[!] to determine their immigration status) -- approximately 79,000 persons from "nations of interest," bureaucratese for Muslim countries, North Korea, and China. Fortunately, that problem has been ameliorated by ordering the remaining BP (now ICE) agents not to stop obviously Asian "visitors" coming across the Mexican (also the Canadian?) border.
I know that if millions of us went to their nations, and behaved as they do when here, we would be lucky to merely be arrested and jailed. So, yes, I like "the Navy's" version of catch and release better than the civilian version. I expect it to become more popular as the sellout progresses. But this one-at-a-time business will need streamlining.
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Happy Thanksgiving, Everyone!
If anyone finds this blog, the wish is sincere.
I have much for which I am thankful: health, love, family, friends -- and a small remnant of the liberty for which this blog is named, sufficient to allow the expressions of my thoughts.
Here's hoping you had a good day!
I have much for which I am thankful: health, love, family, friends -- and a small remnant of the liberty for which this blog is named, sufficient to allow the expressions of my thoughts.
Here's hoping you had a good day!
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Response to Neal Ross
Mr. Ross, I hope this response to your Federal Observer article, “An Angry American Speaks Out,”
http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=12041
doesn’t come off as disagreement, or even criticism, because I certainly echo your sentiment. I do wish however, that you’d speak plainly, and let us know how you really feel. ;-)
But your well-deserved anger shouldn’t be limited to ungrateful and parasitic foreigners -- even though many of them, despite cliché cover stories of simply trying to better their lives, are really here as much to exercise their hostility and disrespect for us, as to work, and are merely putting up with low-paid menial work as the price for getting to do so (while drawing multiple welfare subsidies at our expense, no less.)
Greater blame though, should fall on those in “our” governments who, in blatant opposition to us whom they allegedly serve, first sanction the crimes committed by the invaders, then utilize the problems thus caused as pretext to further subjugate us. Politicians who have a sworn duty to protect us, flaunt their selective non-enforcement of our laws in our faces, then tell us we are stingy racists to ask them to honor their oaths.
Indeed, it would be a close contest (could the truth be known) as to which group holds us in greater contempt – the invaders, or "our" public officials helping them (with our tax money) to supplant us. But "our" government owes us duties that, presumably, invaders do not.
It is all part of what the late Samuel Francis called “anarcho-tyranny,” in an article he titled Synthesizing Tyranny. You might want to read it at:
http://chroniclesmagazine.org/www/Chronicles/2005/April2005/0405Francis.html
He described anarcho-tyranny as:
I think we are both clear as to whom governments at all levels are “letting off the hook”, and on whom they are gleefully cracking down.
Mr. Francis, presenting anarcho-tyranny as one of the main tactics in a wider culture war, went on to point out that:
It pains me to admit that I think it is either far too late, or several centuries too early -- for those few Americans who really understand how comprehensive and intentional is the attack upon them and their rights, and are independent enough to act -- to preserve the liberty of more than an occasional brave and lucky few.
The elites running (ruining) our world have succeeded far too well at mentally crippling the majority of us as children through TV and the Public Fool System, and at burdening us with "debt" far beyond any conceivable ability to "repay." The only "salvation" they offer from the oncoming financial and social collapse of this nation is the burgeoning police state, and our "escape" is likely to be a nuclear-armed Dark Age, unless far more Citizens than now seems likely, wake up and deal with the menacing facts.
When our fellow sheepizens stumble trustingly into the pen, though "our" governments treat us as prey, I say lop off any offending branch thereof you can reach, since it sprouts unbidden, and grows like kudzu -- though herbicides may be more efficient than pruning. But in that cause, the less specific the better, and Committees of One sometimes succeed where mass movements fail.
http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=12041
doesn’t come off as disagreement, or even criticism, because I certainly echo your sentiment. I do wish however, that you’d speak plainly, and let us know how you really feel. ;-)
But your well-deserved anger shouldn’t be limited to ungrateful and parasitic foreigners -- even though many of them, despite cliché cover stories of simply trying to better their lives, are really here as much to exercise their hostility and disrespect for us, as to work, and are merely putting up with low-paid menial work as the price for getting to do so (while drawing multiple welfare subsidies at our expense, no less.)
Greater blame though, should fall on those in “our” governments who, in blatant opposition to us whom they allegedly serve, first sanction the crimes committed by the invaders, then utilize the problems thus caused as pretext to further subjugate us. Politicians who have a sworn duty to protect us, flaunt their selective non-enforcement of our laws in our faces, then tell us we are stingy racists to ask them to honor their oaths.
Indeed, it would be a close contest (could the truth be known) as to which group holds us in greater contempt – the invaders, or "our" public officials helping them (with our tax money) to supplant us. But "our" government owes us duties that, presumably, invaders do not.
It is all part of what the late Samuel Francis called “anarcho-tyranny,” in an article he titled Synthesizing Tyranny. You might want to read it at:
http://chroniclesmagazine.org/www/Chronicles/2005/April2005/0405Francis.html
He described anarcho-tyranny as:
“… both anarchy (the failure of the state to enforce the laws) and, at the same time, tyranny—the enforcement of laws by the state for oppressive purposes….”
I think we are both clear as to whom governments at all levels are “letting off the hook”, and on whom they are gleefully cracking down.
Mr. Francis, presenting anarcho-tyranny as one of the main tactics in a wider culture war, went on to point out that:
“The laws that are enforced are either those that extend or entrench the power of the state and its allies and internal elites … or else they are the laws that directly punish those recalcitrant and “pathological” elements in society who insist on behaving according to traditional norms…. Such dangerous elements are the main targets of the tyranny part of anarcho-tyranny.
"For that matter, they also happen to be the main targets of the anarchy part. The laws that do not get enforced are those that protect such elements and their families and communities…. In the revolution, you see, the ordinary criminal, as well as the illegal immigrant, is at least an honorary member, if not a full-fledged officer, of the revolutionary class, like … countercultural college students and hippies. … common hoodlums who commit rapes, robberies, and murders serve as the de facto field troops of the culture war, and it is hardly an accident that there is now a growing movement to extend the vote to those criminals …. Having served the revolutionary elite well, they deserve a promotion.”
It pains me to admit that I think it is either far too late, or several centuries too early -- for those few Americans who really understand how comprehensive and intentional is the attack upon them and their rights, and are independent enough to act -- to preserve the liberty of more than an occasional brave and lucky few.
The elites running (ruining) our world have succeeded far too well at mentally crippling the majority of us as children through TV and the Public Fool System, and at burdening us with "debt" far beyond any conceivable ability to "repay." The only "salvation" they offer from the oncoming financial and social collapse of this nation is the burgeoning police state, and our "escape" is likely to be a nuclear-armed Dark Age, unless far more Citizens than now seems likely, wake up and deal with the menacing facts.
When our fellow sheepizens stumble trustingly into the pen, though "our" governments treat us as prey, I say lop off any offending branch thereof you can reach, since it sprouts unbidden, and grows like kudzu -- though herbicides may be more efficient than pruning. But in that cause, the less specific the better, and Committees of One sometimes succeed where mass movements fail.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)